beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.03.17 2015고정1915

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving B-learning automobiles.

On October 16, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.168% from the blood transfusion around 23:10 on October 16, 2015, and turn to the left at a speed of about 20 km/h/h of speed at a speed of about 30 km from the opposite side of the sex church located at the head of Gwangju Mine-gu.

At that time, there was a place where traffic is controlled by signal apparatus, so there was a duty of care to prevent the person engaged in driving duty from accidents by safely driving the motor vehicle in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim C(26) who was directly in accordance with the normal signals from the public health university located on the left side of the entrance of the defendant's vehicle in the flood area in violation of this, while entering the intersection, in order to avoid the collision between the driver's vehicle and the part of the defendant's driver's vehicle, which was driven by the victim C(26) of the DN Scoo coo in accordance with the normal signals.

After all, the Defendant suffered from the injury, such as the injury to the victim E (the age of 21) who was on board the above victim and the above victim E (the age of 21) due to the above occupational negligence, requiring approximately two weeks medical treatment.

2. The Defendant is a person who drives a B-learning car in violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On October 16, 2015, the Defendant driven the said car at a section of approximately 200 meters from the front of the trade name in the new town in Gwangju Mine-gu to the front of the sex church located in the same 301, while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.168% among the blood transfusion around 23:10 on October 16, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on detection of drivers;

1. Each of the relevant Articles of the Act concerning the facts of crime;