When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

In B, the defendant uses the undisclosed (Ed) C, and the victim D is working from B to E.

On February 23, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 22:26 on February 23, 2015, when 22:26, the Internet broadcast run by multiple unspecified persons in the Daegu Suwon-gu, the Defendant: (b) on the victim’s Internet broadcast, “I see why I see why I am, I am, and I am, once I am, I am. I do not see why I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, am, am, I am, am, I am, and I am am am., I am. before I am off the victim’s open society.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement D in the second protocol of suspect examination of the accused against the accused;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning each broadcast closure photograph;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;