When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who engages in daily labor.

On December 10, 2009, the Defendant received KRW 1.5 billion from the consulting company to obtain a loan of KRW 1.5 billion from the consulting company without the intent or ability to obtain a loan of KRW 1.5 billion necessary for the construction of the factory from the consulting company in the name of the above complainant in the office of the E, which is operated by the complainant in the city of Mapo-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Changwon-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and acquired KRW 1.5 billion from the consulting company on the same day on the same day.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and D;

1. A protocol concerning the police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement of each police statement made to F and D;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the choice of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;