beta
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2016.06.23 2016고단288

교통사고처리특례법위반등

Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a person engaged in driving a car at CNA.

On December 1, 2015, the Defendant: (a) driven the said car and driven the said car at a speed of 23:2, the Defendant: (b) changed the direction from the right side to the right side of the new road in front of the three-lanes from the right side of the road to the right side of the road; (c) neglected to notify the direction change to the direction change; and (d) neglected to exercise the duty of care to change the two-lanes in a safe way by keeping the traffic situation at the right side; (c) neglected to change the two-lanes; (d) due to the negligence of the victim D (20 years old) driving at the right side of the said car (20 years old) driving at the right side of the said car at the right side of the said car; and (d) caused the injury of the victim, such as the mouth of catage of 6 weeks of treatment at the right side of the said car; and (d) at the same time, damaged the victim’s property to the 1.05 billion won and the 1.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, Article 151 of the Road Traffic Act;

(b) A crime of non-violation of intention: the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Submission of a written agreement in which the victim's expression of intention not to punish him/her on June 6, 2016, after the institution of the instant case

(c) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;