철도 지하터널 구간 실시계획 승인 취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the instant case, is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court of first instance, which cited the “ May 28, 2017” of the first instance No. 3, No. 14, as “ May 18, 2017,” and thus, citing it as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the
2. If so, the plaintiff's lawsuit of this case is unlawful and dismissed, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just with this conclusion. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.