Seized evidence of subparagraphs 1 through 6 shall be confiscated.

B is the owner of a game room without a trade name in Kimpo-si, and the defendant is the so-called "bow president" who is in charge of the business and overall management of the game room.

1. No one shall provide game products for use which have not been rated by the Game Rating Board;

Nevertheless, the Defendant conspired with B, from April 10, 2012 to May 00:40, 2012, in collusion with B, set up 30 game players which were not classified by the Game Rating Board in the above game site and offered them for use to unspecified customers.

2. No one shall arrange for money exchange or money exchange or re-purchase of tangible or intangible results obtained through the use of game products by anyone;

Nevertheless, the defendant, in collusion with B, exchanged the points obtained as a result of the game in collusion with B at the same time and place as the above paragraph (1) and exchanged the points obtained as the result of the game at one point.

Summary of Evidence

1. B Legal statement;

1. A suspect interrogation protocol concerning B by the prosecution;

1. Police and suspect examination protocol of the accused;

1. Each statement of D, E, and F;

1. Seizure records;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (with regard to the situation at the time of the enemy strike, confirmation of the business period through the imposition of electric charges, guidance and attachment for the location of a game room);

1. Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 1 of the relevant Act on the Promotion of Game Industry, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, Article 44 (1) 2 and Article 32 (1) 7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 44 (2) of the Confiscation Industry Promotion Act;