2. There are extenuating circumstances such as the Defendant’s confession of each of the instant crimes.

However, the crime of interference with the execution of official duties needs to be strictly punished in order to resolve the climate that emphasizes legitimate public authority and establish the legal order, and the defendant has been subject to a suspended sentence two times, and has been punished eight times by a fine. Among them, most of them are violent-related criminals, the defendant did not agree with the victim of the crime of injury and the police officer related to the crime of the execution of official duties, and there is no change in circumstances that may be considered in the judgment of the court, and other circumstances that are the conditions for sentencing as indicated in the records and theories of this case, such as the defendant's age, sex, sex, environment, family relationship, means and consequence of the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed unfair because the sentence imposed by the court below is too excessive.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.