살인
The judgment below
The part of the case of the defendant is reversed.
The punishment of the accused shall be determined by 13 years of imprisonment.
seizure.
The defendant alleged that he/she had no intention to kill the victim, on the part of the defendant as to the defendant's case.
The defendant carried a knife in order to protect himself from the driving of the victim and carried the knife in the car. The defendant, first of all, knifeed the victim with his knife, and knife his knife his knife with his knife while getting out of the knife, and knife his knife his kn
Nevertheless, the judgment of the court below which found a guilty of the facts charged is erroneous, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.
Judgment
The Defendant also asserted the same in the lower court.
As to this, the court below's decision on the defendant's argument can be sufficiently predicted that the defendant can die by suffering the other party's knife with the knife of the other party's knife with the knife carried by the defendant in the judgment of the court. ② The defendant has reached the victim's knife and knife with the victim's knife and has reached the left part of the victim's knife.
“A statement to the effect that the victim stated to the effect that “,” and ③ the victim took a 25 cm in depth on the lower left part of the left part, and the Defendant appears to have strongly set the part of the victim when considering the depth and knive length (21 cm), ④ immediately after the crime, the Defendant did not take measures to rescue the victim, and did an act such as threatening the victim’s behavior or inducing the victim to find a knife, and ⑤ the Defendant was trying to defend by assaulting the victim from the victim’s behavior. However, the Defendant rejected the Defendant’s assertion and convicted the Defendant of the charges on the ground that the situation was not an imminent situation to the point that the Defendant had to display the knife the knife.
According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the court below recognized various circumstances and there are the same reasons.