When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 25, 2015, at around 00:50, the Defendant: (a) committed violence, such as assaulting at the left side of the above B, and obstructing the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties in relation to the handling of reporting duties and the protection of wres, etc., 112 reports on the 1112, where B, a police officer of the Dongjak Police Station, dispatched to the site upon receipt of a 112 report, she prevented the Defendant and gets home to stop the Defendant; (b) she spits down the me, she flaf., and f., she f.e., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., f., of the 1112 reporting duty and drinking.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statement No. B

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the order of provisional payment is that the crime of obstructing the performance of official duties is likely to undermine the authority of the public authority and disrupt the establishment of legal order, and thus, it is urgently

However, the defendant recognized the facts charged of this case and reflects his mistake, and the first offender was drunk and led to this case, and the defendant's age, character and conduct, intelligence and environment, relationship with the victim, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., and the conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments, such as circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by the sentence.