If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On March 20, 2015, the Defendant, at around 07:57, was disputing the Defendant’s house located in the Dong-gu, Sinsan-si, Sinsan-si, B and 102, and under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant, upon receiving a report 112, reported that “A person under the influence of alcohol” was aware of the details of the report against “A person under the influence of alcohol” and “A person under the influence of alcohol” was attached to C and Sinan-si.

The defendant was assaulted by the defendant, by his hand, such as "catch", that the defendant was "catched" and "catched by the s team batbridge fat," the defendant was satched by the satch fat, and the defendant was satched by a police officer who was satched by drinking at one time, and the body was pushed by a police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the maintenance of police officers' order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement statement made to E;

1. Determination of a fine shall be made by taking into account the circumstances, such as Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines, the defendant's attitude against the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant appears to have been under the influence of alcohol and has no record of crime other than fines and there is no record

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the custody of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.