However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 18, 2016, the Defendant, at around 08:27, 08:27, coming from the back on the back side road of the Jeju Island, which was not covered by mandatory insurance on the front side of the Jeju Island, had the victim D(67) driving the said road from the north to the south of the road without confirming the E-mail of the victim D(67 aged) driving the said road. In order to avoid the said cargo, the victim suffered bodily injury, such as the two-way frame, which requires approximately four weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement;

1. Report on the occurrence of the traffic accident, and Do Governor of the Investigation Statement; and

1. Investigation report (acceptance of a written statement on behalf of the victim), investigation report (temporary re-determination of the accident);

1. Investigation report (the image of a motor vehicle for the accident scene booms);

1. Inquiry into the tea (C) and mandatory insurance (C);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act (the occupation of causing occupational negligence, selection of imprisonment without prison labor), Article 46 (2) and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Compensation Act (the occupation of operating automobiles which are not mandatory insurance, the choice of imprisonment with prison labor);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2 and (2), and Article 50 of the same Act (the punishment shall be aggravated for concurrent crimes prescribed in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the punishment of which shall be aggravated, but shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor within the scope aggregated with the long-term punishment for the above two crimes);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following circumstances considered in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Scope of sentencing recommended according to the sentencing criteria;

A. The scope of recommendation [the scope of recommendation] for a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the scope of punishment [the scope of recommendation] shall be the basic area (the injury caused by traffic accidents in April to October) (the person who is subject to special sentencing].

B. Article 37 of the Criminal Act is applicable to the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents for which the sentencing guidelines set are set and the violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation for which no sentencing guidelines