beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.10.24 2018고단1416

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 27, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of four months for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Busan District Court on December 27, 2006, and the same court on June 27, 2016 issued a summary order of KRW 5 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving). In addition, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 5 million more than twice.

1. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) is a person who is engaged in the operation of a passenger car with B thesis.

On April 29, 2018, the Defendant driven the said car with alcohol level of 0.105% in the blood without a driver's license on April 17:0, 2018, and proceeded at a non-speed speed in accordance with the direction of the two-lane road, which is located in the Seongbuk-dong, Busan Metropolitan City, through the intersection of the signal signal, etc. No. 10, 10,000, from the side of the Cuk-do.

A person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by driving at a safe speed and in a safe manner.

Nevertheless, as long as the Defendant neglected his duty to see on the front bank by negligence, the lower part of the victim C(20) driving, which was stopped due to the vehicle’s body at the front bank, was placed in front of the above Defendant’s test. Accordingly, the above Switzerland car, which was pushed down by the front bank, was stopped on the front bank.

E(53) Operation 53(S) led to the string of the FN car.

As a result, the suspect suffered injury to the victim C, such as catherum, catum catum, tension, etc., which requires approximately two weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (drinking) and the Road Traffic Act (drinking without a license) driving a motor vehicle in the shape of alcohol leveling 0.105% of alcohol level while under the influence of alcohol leveling 0.105% without a driver’s license at the distance of about 3 km from a day-to-day macrooctic zone, which is the same as the above paragraph 1 to the accident place under the above paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C and E.