beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2018.04.19 2017구단34745

난민불인정결정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The plaintiff is well-known.

A foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Korea (hereinafter referred to as the "Korea"), who entered the Republic of Korea on May 28, 2016, with the status of stay C-3 (short-term Visit).

B. On June 3, 2016, the Plaintiff filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant. However, on March 13, 2017, the Defendant rendered a disposition for refugee status refusal (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “the well-founded fear that there is a possibility of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).

C. On April 5, 2017, the Plaintiff appealed to the instant disposition and filed an objection with the Minister of Justice, but the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as October 11, 2017.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserted that he/she was a party member of the Party B, who was a Party B, around October 2015, and around November 2015, the Plaintiff raised support payments of USD 200 to the political party B.

After that, the Plaintiff also played a role in preparing and promoting the speech by the party leaders B when making a speech.

On the other hand, U.S.C.

In February 16, 2016, the last election price of C, which was a candidate for the President of B Party, was located in the Marinle University (Mkererere Univ) playground on February 16, 2016.

At the time, conflict between the police and the B party support parties occurred, and the plaintiff was arrested to the police and detained for about five days in the police station (andandegeya).

At present U.S.C.

In this regard, D has the suppression of the activities of the party, and the plaintiff will return to its own country.