2. It is recognized that the Defendants were aware of the crime of this case when they were in the judgment of the court, and showed an attitude against the Defendants.

However, it appears that the Defendants would have obtained considerable benefits from the instant crime, and Defendant C had the record of criminal punishment for the violation of the Immigration Control Act even before the instant crime was committed, etc., was disadvantageous to the Defendants.

In full view of the above circumstances and the Defendants’ age, character and conduct, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, and all the sentencing factors expressed in the instant records and trial process, such as the circumstances after the crime was committed, the sentence imposed by the lower court shall not be deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, or to be too unreasonable.

3. As such, the Defendants’ appeal is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.