When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Defendant is not a narcotics handler.

On August 14, 2015, the Defendant and B collected approximately 0.1g of the Meditopule (one philophone; hereinafter “philophone”) which is a local mental medicine, in the dwelling area of Ansan-si, Asan-si, and B, around 21:0 on August 14, 2015, and 0.1g of the Meditopule (one philophone; hereinafter referred to as “philophone”), respectively, in plastic beverages prepared to pass through as soon as the postponement arises by heating the merogate, and inhaled the 5-6 meopphone, respectively.

Accordingly, the Defendant and B administered each philophone.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the accused;

1. Protocol concerning the examination of suspect B by the public prosecutor;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as a written appraisal of narcotics (A cryp), a drilling report (related to response to a request for appraisal of narcotics), a criminal investigation report (including a report on the market price of narcotics, such as mert crypers, etc.), an investigation report

1. Article 60 (1) 2, Article 4 (1) and subparagraph 3 (b) of Article 2 and Article 60 of the Act on the Selection and Management of Narcotics, Etc., concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The proviso to Article 67 of the Narcotics Control Act;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;