However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a B-Wood vehicle.

On October 3, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car at around 06:50 on October 3, 2013, and driven the road of four-lanes in front of the Gangnamnam Hospital, Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, which is located in 650-9, in Gangnam-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, along three-lanes from the calendar to the educational dynamic.

Since there is an intersection where a signal, etc. has been installed, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has entered the intersection in another direction by reducing speed and properly examining the side, and to safely drive the motor vehicle according to the traffic signal and prevent the accident in advance.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and continued to proceed at the same speed without making a stop even when the signal is changed to a stop signal, and thereby making it left to the light apartment from the opposite direction to the light apartment at the intersection, due to the negligence of entering the intersection, the Defendant left the right side of the driver C(37 years old) driving of the victim C(37 years old) who entered the intersection, and received a part of the right side to the right side of the passenger car of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, sustained injury to the victim C, such as the catitis that requires treatment for about two weeks, and sustained injury to the victim E (the 29 years old) who was on board the said cargo, such as catitis that requires treatment for about two weeks, and at the same time, went away without taking necessary measures, such as immediately stopping the said cargo and providing relief to the victim, even though the repair cost of KRW 868,916 was damaged to the degree of the repair cost of KRW 868,916, such as the total

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. F’s statement on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Investigation report (the result of checking the video records of scamblings);

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the written estimate statutes;

1. Specific crimes as prescribed in the corresponding provisions of the Act regarding criminal facts.