beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2019.07.26 2019고단857

변호사법위반

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

6,0230,000 won shall be additionally collected from the defendant.

As to the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On May 25, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one-year suspended sentence for a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, etc. (Mediation Property) at the Gwangju District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 2, 2017.

【Criminal Facts】

The defendant is the head of the government-funded contract awarded by the order of the Seoul metropolitan area, B, etc., and C is the actual operator of the dispute resolutionD (amended by the Corporation E).

No person shall receive or promise to receive money, valuables, entertainment or other benefits under the pretext of solicitation or arrangement for cases or affairs handled by a public official.

The defendant asked public officials in charge of government-funded contract B to accept contracts by certain companies, to receive money and valuables from companies under its pretext, and to introduce specific companies that can conclude government-funded contracts at B.

Accordingly, C proposed that “G” representative director of G (hereinafter “G”) located in the Seoul Sung-gun F of the early 2014, “B would request the public official in charge of the contract for the supply of goods at the time so that G would be able to receive the contract, so that G would be able to receive the contract,” and then notified the Defendant with H’s consent.

Accordingly, from February 2, 2014 to December 2014, the Defendant requested the public official in charge of contracts to deliver the products of G, etc. to supply the products of G, etc., after confirming the conclusion of the contract, contact C with G, etc. to receive the price for concluding the contract from G, etc., and C received KRW 6,023,00 from the company from March 2014 to December 2014 in return for concluding the contract, and delivered it to the Defendant.

As a result, the defendant received money and valuables under the pretext of soliciting or arranging the affairs handled by the public officials.

Summary of Evidence

1..