A. The punishment sentenced by the lower court (one hundred months of imprisonment, additional collection of KRW 10,200,00) is too unreasonable.

B. The sentence imposed by the prosecutor by the court below is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. We examine each of the grounds for unfair sentencing by the Defendant and the prosecutor.

The crime of this case is committed by acquiring money from a victim under the pretext of solicitation for the affairs that public officials handle, and the nature of the crime is bad, and the damage has not yet been recovered.

On the other hand, the defendant reflects the crime of this case and is able to be punished for the same kind of crime, but after being sentenced to two years of imprisonment on July 31, 200, there is no record of being punished for the same crime.

In addition, in full view of various circumstances, such as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, details and contents of the offense, and circumstances after the offense, the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed as appropriate, too heavy or too unreasonable.

Therefore, the above argument by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.