If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

The defendant is the owner C's son's son, and the victim D(69) is the tenant of the above house.

around 18:30 on March 24, 2017, the Defendant had visited the victim D to pay the water tax in front of the stairs of the above house, and had a complaint against the expansion and repair of the house by the victim, and restored the house to the original state by five months.

Gins. Rarkh zins

The hume knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knife the victim's knee knee.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D, E, and F;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of the suspect of the police against the accused (including the D substitute part);

1. Each police statement made to D or E;

1. Request for cooperation in investigation (request for verification of details of 112 declarations) - List of reported cases;

1. Inquiry into communication confirmation data;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a factual inquiry reply (G hospital medical fees and diagnosis reports);

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines concerning the crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the assertion by the Defendant and his defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. First, the defendant and his defense counsel asserts that the defendant did not depict the victim's breath as stated in the facts charged.

Therefore, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the defendant is punished for Si expenses with respect to the restoration of the leased part between the victim and the victim's father C, which is the victim's father, and it is true that the victim was injured on knee knee fee feee fee fee fee fee fee fee fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe fe