When the defendant does not pay the above fine, he/she shall be the defendant for two days.

On January 17, 2017, the Defendant driven a C&L car around 15:03 on January 17, 2017, and moved bypass the square (urban gas error distance) of 49, which is located in the Busan Southern-gu B-dong, from the south intersection to the right-side bank.

Since there is a place where traffic is controlled by signal apparatus, the driver of the vehicle passing along the road has a duty to proceed in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the defendant did not follow the stop signals at the above time and place.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Investigation report (the analysis, etc. of traffic signal control devices) (the defendant and his defense counsel asserts that there is no fact of violating the stop signal at the time and place as indicated in the judgment.

However, D, a police officer who controlled the Defendant at the time of the instant case, is consistent in the police and this court, and consistent “A signal installed on the sponser crosswalk of the route in which the Defendant was in operation and the right-way signal on the direction of the Defendant is connected to the signal signal on the spacker crosswalk, and a red signal is carried out on the signal on the direction of the Defendant when entering green signal on the signal on the spacker crosswalk.

At the time of the instant case, it was clearly confirmed that green signal has been put to the signal signal on the flap crosswalk at the time of the instant case, and controlled the Defendant’s violation of signal.

“The statement was made to the effect that it was “.”

According to the present City/Do for traffic signal control around the instant site, it can be confirmed that the signal signal, etc. installed in the bypass prior to the Defendant’s operation route and the signal signal, etc. installed in the above-mentioned crosswalk are connected to D’s statement. Even if considering the on-site photograph, etc. submitted by the Defendant and his/her defense counsel, it is impossible or considerably difficult to witness the signal, etc. at the location where the police officer was a police officer at the time of the instant case.

It is not visible.

Therefore, D's above statements can be trusted and therefore.