과실폭발성물건파열
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On October 2010, the Defendant: (a) around the end of 2010, the victim D (n, 58 years of age) in the Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu; (b) used the victim D (n, 58 years of age) as radio operator and residence; and (c) linked gas pipes from LPG gas through the victim D upon the victim D’s request.
However, in such a case, since gas leakage is highly likely to occur through pipes and gas leakage is likely to cause large-scale damage to human lives and property due to gas explosion, a qualified person who completed a certain safety education and completed the construction of gas facilities shall not use a T-type valve in cases where one gas pipeline is divided into more than two parts in order to prevent gas leakage.
Nevertheless, the Defendant not only did not receive safety education but also did not meet the relevant qualifications and connected two gas pipelines with the T-type valves, and caused gross negligence in installing gas pipelines through T-type valves, etc. in a way that the connected part is sealed with the tape.
Accordingly, at around 17:20 on November 13, 2010, the Defendant: (a) 17:20, the Defendant: (b) turned out and explosioned into gas gas from which the instant instant fire is leaked, and (c) thereby, the Defendant changed the victim E (the aged 40) to “AC” for the core 20 weeks of the telegraph that requires approximately 20 weeks of treatment; (d) the victim E (the aged 40) residing in the same building suffered an open upper part of the bridge that requires approximately 2 weeks of treatment; and (e) at the same time, the victim F suffers an open upper part of the bridge; and (e) at the same time, the victim F’s building damages its repair cost to the extent of KRW 134,010,000. However, the “AH” in No. 22 is amended to “AC”.
In addition, 28 persons, such as the statement, have caused property risk equivalent to 202,689,422 won.
Summary of Evidence
1. Partial statement of the defendant;
1. Each legal statement of witness G and D 1.