When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

1. Defendant A, on November 14, 2016, was aware of the fact that Defendant A was in the Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and the first floor, and that he was aware of the fact that Defendant A was in a mobile use application in the previous name.

F In mind to open a mobile phone by stealing the personal information of the F, without F’s consent or permission, the application for the use of the mobile phone was forged and used for the purpose of exercising rights and duties over 19 times from November 14, 2016 to January 16, 2017, by stating that F is “G” and “F” in the name column of the application for the use of the cell phone in the form of “F” and “F” in the form of the applicant’s name, forging the application for the use of the mobile phone, and transmitting the said application for the use of the mobile phone in the form of sale e-mail as if it was duly completed, and using it in the form of sale e-mail as if it was duly completed.

2. Defendant B, on November 21, 2016, was aware of the fact that the Defendant was in the Seo-gu Daejeon D and the first floor of Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and the first floor, that he had been aware of the fact that he was aware of the fact that he had leased the previous title to the application

In mind to open a mobile phone by stealing the personal information of H, without the consent of H, and without permission, the application for the use of a mobile phone was forged by means of signing the application in the column for entry into the name of “H” and “H” on the monthly day of November of the year in which H’s application form was made, and as if the application form was duly completed by using the aforementioned mobile phone, the aforementioned application form was sent back to the occupying e-mail, which is the business operator, by means of sale e-mail, and then the application form for the purchase of a mobile phone, which is a private document related to rights and duties, was forged and exercised for the purpose of exercising 14 times from November 11, 2016 to January 9, 2017, respectively.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of a police officer in relation to J, K, L, M, N, H,O, or P;

1. Statement made by each police of Q, R and S;

1. Each application for mobile use;

1. Each CJ.