However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 11:50 on January 18, 2017, the Defendant does not open doors despite the existence of the said D in front of the entrance of the residence of the Victim C, located in C (D's residence leased) located in Sam-do, 2017.

I think of this, the victim's property was damaged by breaking the door door door of 60,00 won at the market price of the victim's ownership by using the chain pipe around the above entrance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a receipt for payment of damage, a report on 112 case handling table, and a report on investigation (the confirmation of the owner of the house entrance damaged by the person under consideration);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the fact that there is no past record exceeding the fine and the amount of damage, etc.);