[criminal records] On September 11, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Daejeon District Court’s Incheon Branch Branch of the Daejeon District Court, and was exempted from the execution of remaining punishment (pre-determined to be terminated on February 7, 2013) by special amnesty on January 12, 2012 during the execution of the sentence.

[2] On March 6, 2014, the Defendant was awarded a contract with the victim AK (52 tax) located in the Seocheon-gu AJ in Seocheon-gu AJ around March 2014 with the AI (the Daejeon District Court's non-detained of the Daejeon District Court on March 6, 2015) for the construction project ordered by the victim in the office of the KAK (52 tax) of the KAL operating the KAW.

In order to supply steel-frames to the AM, the KAM made a false statement that “The KAM will pay the price of the materials as it ends shall be paid as the inspection of the KAM construction is completed.”

However, at the time, the Defendant and AI did not have any business funds, and instead, they should purchase the primary steel materials from AO, and there was no intention or ability to carry out subcontracting works, such as the failure to prepare factories and construction sites to carry out the manufacturing and construction of steel frame.

In addition, from around 2012 to 2013, the Defendant was responsible for the amount of approximately KRW 270,000,000 with the scrap metal price and factory site usage fee, etc. while operating the G in charge of the settlement of accounts from around 2012 to around 2013, and the Defendant was not paid approximately KRW 140,000 to the employees of the G in charge of the settlement of accounts.

In the end, even if the defendant and AI were to be supplied with steel materials from the injured party, they did not perform the steel frame construction from the beginning to pay the materials to the injured party, but did not dispose of the steel frame materials supplied by the injured party at their own discretion to repay the existing debts, so there was no intention or ability to pay the steel materials to the injured party.

Nevertheless, the defendant and AI deceivings the victim as above, and they go through L. In the case of the dynamic A operated by the defendant from the victim.