Where a defendant fails to pay a fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

The facts charged are also stated in the facts that the defendant took a bath, but the prosecutor did not prosecute the facts as a crime of insult, and the defendant's intimidationd a public official in the performance of his duties is not deemed to have been prosecuted. As such, among the facts charged, the part corresponding to the obstruction of performance of duties (the part of violence against a public official performing his duties) among the facts charged is organized as follows and recognized the facts charged

On January 6, 2014, the Defendant: (a) committed assaulting D’s loss in the above first-aid vehicle during the first-aid vehicle, and obstructed fire officers’ 119 report processing and legitimate execution of duties concerning the second-aid service of an emergency patient, by assaulting the E’s face at one time, and assaulting a fire officer’s 119 report processing and the second-aid service of an emergency patient.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D and E;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime concerned;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (the defendant has been punished several times for violent crimes, but he/she has no record of being punished for the same kind of crime);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;