If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

On January 12, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime of injury, etc. in the Gwangju District Court's Netcheon Branch on January 12, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Wood Prison on October 29, 2012

On August 18, 2013, around 00:50 on August 18, 2013, at the main point of “D” in the operation of the victim C of the Seo-gu Incheon Seo-gu Incheon Building 302, the Defendant expressed that the main employee E did not pay the drinking value at once.” The Defendant expressed that the main employee E did not pay the drinking value at once.

Accordingly, according to the "drawing of the victim", the defendant is more chemicalized, the victim was faced with the victim by gathering the chair, and the victim was broken at the bottom of the winder, the wall, and the wall, the bottom of the winder's body, the stormer's body, and the glass disease displayed on the back of the wall is broken, and the strike is boomed on the left side of the victim.

As a result, the above victim suffered from the above victim about two weeks of medical treatment, and the defendant damaged the victim's chairss, stormers, and barriers to the repair cost of 3050,000 won in total, and obstructed the victim's main duties by getting the customers out of the above main points by avoiding the disturbance.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Each photograph;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, investigation reports, and application of a copy of judgment;

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and the choice of punishment for the crime: Articles 257(1), 314(1) and 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), and 366 of the Criminal Act (the selection of fines: Although a crime during the period of repeated crime is committed, the defendant was given 5 million won to the victim and agreed to pay 5 million won to the victim, and the defendant was in depth and committed by the defendant is seen as a contingent crime)

1. Aggravation of concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Detention at a workhouse: