However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. 피고인은 2014. 6. 25.경 구미시 봉곡동에 있는 상호를 알 수 없는 참치횟집 식당에서 피해자 C에게 “내 친동생이 LG그룹 임원으로 있는데 그룹 간에 임원끼리 상호 윈윈 차원에서 LG에서 삼성으로, 삼성에서 LG로 소개취업을 시켜주고 있습니다. 제 집사람과 제수씨가 삼성회사에 4,500만 원 소개비를 주고 친딸을 삼성회사에 입사를 시킨 사실이 있습니다. 딸을 삼성전자에 입사시키기 위해서는 1,500만 원이 필요합니다”라는 취지로 거짓말을 하였다.

However, the defendant's friendship was not an executive of the LG Group, and there was no employee employed between the LG Group and the Samsung Group, and there was no employee employed between the defendant's wife and the Samsung Electronic. Thus, even if the defendant did not receive money from the victim, there was no intention or ability to get the victim's dependent to work for Samsung Electronic.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 15 million from the victim under the pretext of employment recommendation expenses on June 27, 2014.

2. Around August 10, 2014, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “When his/her wife is employed by Samsung Electronic Co., Ltd. in his/her husband and wife, he/she would not have a dormitory if his/her wife is employed by his/her husband and wife, he/she would also go to and from work together with his/her husband and wife if he/she goes to and from work together with his/her husband and wife.” However, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “in order to get his/her husband and wife’s employee into the group, he/she

However, in fact, the defendant's friendship was not an executive officer of the LG Group, and there was no employee employed between the LG Group and the Samsung Group. Moreover, even if the defendant's father and the defendant did not enter the Samsung Electronic, there was no intention or ability to get the victim's dependent to work for Samsung Electronic, even if he did not receive money from the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant is the victim as above.