건축주명의변경절차이행
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the
However, some of the arguments are written as follows, and the judgment of the defendant is added to the defendant's argument as follows 3.
2. The volume of the enemy shall be changed to "the defendant" and shall be changed to "the defendant" in 3 pages 5 of the judgment of the first instance court.
The "Defendant" in the 3rd page 8 shall be changed to "Plaintiff" and shall be entered.
The 4th page " January 11, 201" shall be changed to " January 12, 2011", and the entry shall be made.
The 6th 13th 13th "right to claim materials" shall be changed into "right to claim land rent."
The five pages 10 shall be filled by "No. 11" by "No. 11, 15, 16, and 17".
In the 10th page 12, "Defendant A" shall be changed to "Plaintiff A" and shall be entered.
3. Determination of the attached articles
A. Under the Plaintiff’s understanding, the instant sales contract asserted by the Defendant was concluded with the content that the Defendant purchased the instant land, etc. from the Plaintiff, took out a multi-family housing sales project with a loan secured by the Plaintiff, and paid the Plaintiff the purchase price of the instant land, etc. with the proceeds from the sale.
However, unlike the initial expectation, the Defendant’s loan amounted to KRW 160,000,000,000 for each household, and the Plaintiff’s loaned to carry out the apartment house construction and the apartment house sale project. In the process, the Plaintiff did not enter into a lease contract with respect to KRW 540,000,000 out of KRW 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,0000,0000,000
In violation of the above contract and special agreement of the Plaintiff, the sales contract of this case became impossible to achieve its purpose.
Accordingly, the Defendant, based on the right to rescind an agreement under Article 5(3) of the sales contract of this case or the right to rescind an agreement under Article 546 of the Civil Act, raises objection against the Plaintiff on or around December 12, 2014.