except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On September 7, 2019, from around 05:00 to 06:20, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force, such as “D” operated by the victim C located in Daegu-gu Seo-gu B, Daegu-gu, stating, “D” that the victim “I will see why I will spathn, why I will am al, why I will am al, or why I will am al, or why I will ignore people.”

2. The Defendant destroyed and damaged property by causing defects in glass amounting to KRW 100,000, the market price of the victim C, which is the victim C, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Articles 314(1) and 316 of the Criminal Act (a point of interference with business), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (a point of destruction and damage of property), and choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the cases of penance and the cases of agreement with the victim, etc.);