If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

around 21:55 on October 19, 2018, the Defendant: (a) filed a 112 report stating “the Defendant threatens without returning his mobile phone”; and (b) filed a request with the reporter to return his mobile phone from the Chuncheon Police Station B district, the background leading up to the Defendant’s dispatch of the Defendant’s cell phone from the police officer C; and (c) requested the reporter to return home to the Defendant, and return the mobile phone from the police officer D, who was in a private relationship, to the police officer’s desire to take care of the police officer’s intervention, spath, and camping.” On two occasions, the Defendant carried out the above C and D with the ship and chest, respectively.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to C and D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of a selective fine (the amount of fine shall be determined in consideration of the degree of exercising the tangible power of this case, the fact that the defendant has no same power, the confession and reflects on the defendant, the physical parts of the defendant, the form of assault, the age and environment of the defendant, the circumstances after the crime, etc.), etc.

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;