When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On September 18, 2017, at around 03:00, the Defendant: (a) committed theft with one gallon card in S5 mobile phones and one gallon card (connection with the Saemaul Treasury E) located in the victim’s cell phone case, when the victim was locked with the victim D, and was locked with the victim D, which became aware of at the construction site at the construction site at around 303:0,00 on September 18, 2017; (b) while the victim was locked with the victim D, the victim was in charge of the other victim’s head.

2. On September 18, 201, the Defendant violated the Act on Financial Business Specializing in Fraud and Credit, as mentioned in the above paragraph (1), stolen a eck card, and took place as if he had the right to use the said card despite the absence of the intent or ability to pay the price due to the lack of cash or other means of payment. On September 18, 2017, the Defendant paid KRW 16,000 as taxi expenses at the eception time below 04:00 on September 18, 2017; KRW 4,000 as he purchased tobacco at the G convenience store located in the eception city F around 04:30 on the same day; around 05:00 on the same day, he paid KRW 5,650 as 5,50 as eception with the eception and the eception at H around 00 on the same day; and KRW 20:00 on the 20th day of the same month.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim taxi drivers and the convenience store operators who are not aware of the name of the other party to the transaction of the physical card used as above, obtained the same amount of financial benefits, and used the stolen physical card.

3. On September 19, 2017, the Defendant attempted to commit fraud: (a) called the victim L who was the mother of D with a stolen cell phone from the southyang Eup/Myeon on September 19, 2017, as mentioned in the foregoing paragraph (1) and carried out as if he were D; and (b) send only 250,000 won as the passbook because there is no drinking money and there is no money.

In other words, the Defendant attempted to defraud 250,000 won from the damaged person, but the Defendant did not forward money to the Defendant. However, the Defendant did not receive money from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written Statements 1.