난민불인정결정취소
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea as a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Egyp of Egyp (hereinafter “Egyp”) of the Republic of Egypt (hereinafter “Egypt”) on September 18, 2017.
B. On October 20, 2017, the Plaintiff filed an application for recognition of refugee status with the Defendant, but on June 25, 2018, the Defendant rendered a disposition on the recognition of refugee status (hereinafter “instant disposition”) to the Plaintiff on the ground that it is difficult to recognize “profuges with sufficient grounds for fear of persecution” as stipulated in Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Convention”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”) and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees (hereinafter “Refugee Protocol”).
C. On July 13, 2018, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice against the instant disposition. However, the Minister of Justice dismissed the Plaintiff’s objection on the same ground as the Plaintiff’s objection on May 27, 2019.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 3, Eul evidence 1 to 3, and the purport of whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion caused a traffic accident that conflicts with other automobiles by driving a motor vehicle on April 2015, which led to the Plaintiff’s occurrence of a traffic accident. The women on board the other party’s motor vehicle, who was on board the other party’s motor vehicle, died of his/her son.
The victimized female filed a complaint with the plaintiff and the criminal case was in progress, and the plaintiff concluded the case with the agreement amount ($ 9,000) given to the victimized female.
However, the victimized female filed a complaint again in the name of his or her deceased baby and the criminal case related thereto was conducted, and the plaintiff was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six years.
After the above ruling, the injured female threatens to detain the plaintiff through a police officer who is a family member.
The plaintiff is his home country.