성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, on April 27, 2014, at around 21:30, received a telephone call from the Defendant’s “DDak” operated by the Defendant, who had been running in Goung-gun C, to request the delivery of the vehicle from E, and the Defendant, who is a female employee, delivered the vehicle to F, and the customer, “the time” is defective.
In addition, Mad, Madices had received KRW 400,000 from her customers for time, width of KRW 400,000,000, and the date the customer wants to do.
“In doing so, the said F had the said F engage in sexual traffic by receiving KRW 20,00,00 from the said E in cash 510,000 from the said E in Hasong-gun G, the said F had the said F engage in sexual intercourse, as described in the list of crimes in the attached Table of crimes, four times in total from April 24, 2014 to April 28, 2014, thereby having the said F engage in sexual intercourse with the customers who ordered the said “D D D D D D D” in the said manner.
Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.
2. It is recognized that, first of all, the defendant's multiple employees F have engaged in sexual traffic with the attached I as stated in the judgment.
B. We examine whether the defendant has arranged such sexual traffic.
As shown in the above facts charged, there is a statement by the police against F, a statement by the police, a statement by the F, and an accusation.
Meanwhile, the evidence may be used only when it is proved that the statement or preparation was made under particularly reliable circumstances in accordance with the proviso of Article 314 of the Criminal Procedure Act, since the F is unclear at present by the person who made the statement or the preparing person.
In addition, the "certification of whether it was done under particularly reliable circumstances" should be sufficient to the extent that it is likely to do so, and should be ruled out to the extent that there is reasonable doubt.
The following circumstances revealed in the records of the instant case, and ① F is paid a advance payment from the Defendant.