2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On April 29, 2019, the Defendant posted an article [Attachment 2] on the Defendant’s website (C) (hereinafter “instant article”) (hereinafter “instant article”) under the title D.

B. The article of this case includes the following contents:

(hereinafter referred to as "part of article"). (i) A worker E was dead at 3:40 o'clock 29 o'clock 29 o'clock 40 o'clock.

E is a member of the Fno-A Mountainous Districts Association.

The FMM stipulated the deceased as the victim of the destruction of old-age.

(A) The FMM 29 days’ name stated that “the deceased did not leave a representative in the labor union, and did not see that he was at the head of the strike. When working in the Incheon factory, the deceased was able to maintain the spirit of the GMM,” and that “it was the extreme pressure of the company to write down her satise. It was the extreme pressure of the company. There was a disciplinary action against the satise in writing, and the factory atmosphere to make the satise unsatisfy and unsatisfy that the satise would seriously harm the mental health of the strong members.”

B. Shelin transferred that “A member’s mental health status survey was determined as a high-risk group with severe stressed disorder by 30%. In the past year, three members were used at the distance from the factory between 30 days and 30 days.”

According to the Trade Union and Labor Relations Act, 6 members were suffering from cerebral dystrophism after the destruction of the union.

Article 22(1) of the former Labor Relations Commission Act provides that “The workers of the HJ plant who consulted on the past’s mental health shall be subject to serious pressure from the company of the deceased.” “At the time, four members of the G Labor Relations Commission and four members of the G Labor Relations Commission were engaged in serious surveillance at the time when the members of the G Labor Relations Commission were easy or boomed, and the G Labor Relations Commission was seriously informed at the time when the members of the G Labor Relations Commission were fasted or boomed.” The Appellant was also unable to do so in relation to the maintenance and abolition of the J plant.”

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, entry of Gap evidence 1, purport of whole pleadings

2. Part I of an engineer;

A. The plaintiff's assertion.