beta
(영문) 서울행정법원 2014.06.27 2013구합27197

난민불인정처분취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

The Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on June 14, 2005, and filed an application for refugee status with the Defendant on July 22, 201, as a foreigner of the nationality of the Republic of Pakistan (hereinafter referred to as "Pakistan").

The defendant, on February 4, 2013, promulgated with sufficient grounds for persecution (the Immigration Control Act (amended by Act No. 11298, Feb. 10, 2012; hereinafter the same shall apply)

) On the ground that Article 2 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees cannot be deemed to exist (hereinafter “instant disposition”) a disposition for non-recognition of refugees (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

The Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on March 12, 2013, but the said objection was dismissed on October 22, 2013.

[Grounds for recognition] A’s evidence Nos. 1-1, 2, 2-2, 1-1, and 1-1, and the purport of the entire argument as to whether the disposition of the instant case is legitimate or not, but the Plaintiff’s residential area of Pakistan’s allegation that the disposition of the instant case was legitimate. However, “C,” which was the wife’s wife’s wife’s wife’s wife, was a case of murdering his wife’s and his/her

The Plaintiff’s father lent the cash to B, but C, on October 13, 2010, threatened the Plaintiff to kill the Plaintiff if he did not lend the money to the Plaintiff who returned to Pakistan at the time of his return.

In order to avoid threats from C, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea again, and is not able to return to the Republic of Korea due to C's existence until now.

In the event that the plaintiff returned to his home country, although there was a well-founded fear of gambling, the defendant did not recognize the plaintiff as a refugee, so the disposition of this case is unlawful.

It shall be as shown in the attached Form of the relevant statutes.

According to Article 2 of the Immigration Control Act, and Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees, the term "refugees" is likely to be imprisoned for reasons of race, religion, ethnicity, membership of a specific social group, or political opinion.