B In 1 and 6 months of imprisonment, Defendant AV is punished by a fine of 5 million won, Defendant AG is punished by imprisonment of 10 months, and Defendant AH.

1. The Defendants committed the fraud of Defendant B, Defendant AG, and Defendant AH conspired with the public prosecutor’s office in sequence, which is the general responsibility of the criminal organization, in order to commit the fraud of telephone financing (the so-called “scaming”; hereinafter the “scaming”), and committed the act of misrepresenting the public prosecutor’s office to many unspecified people, and then “I would withdraw the money of the passbook because the name of the victim was stolen and then leave the money to the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service to the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service, and I would safely keep the money.” The victims discovered that the victims were the employees of the Financial Supervisory Service and received money.

On the other hand, at a place where the place of July 3, 2017 cannot be known, AZ, etc. of the above Bospishing organization was opened in the name of the victim AD (e.g., 24 years old) by misrepresenting the victim AE inspection at the central center in Seoul, and the telephone was under investigation of the illegal fraud case in the name of the person AF, and two Spps were established in the name of ADC.

There is no problem if it is proved that the AD is a victim of damage.

The corporate bank withdraws all the money in the HG account to verify whether the balance of the corporate bank is laundry, as the bank used mainly by the frauds, and confirms that the money is not problematic if the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, and then return it again to the corporate bank account.

The phrase “ makes a false statement.”

However, the fact was that the above Bosishing staff had been aware that they had obtained money by deceiving the victim through misrepresentation of the prosecution.

Then, the Defendants received the order of the above AZ and received the order of 13:31 on the same day from the 13:31 day, and reported the network in the vicinity of the Ha, the Defendant B, and the AH, and the Defendant AG acquired the victim by 22 million won after drinking the victim as he was an employee of the Financial Supervisory Service, while doing so as to be the employee of the Financial Supervisory Service.

As such, the Defendants, in collusion with the above AZ, acquired the money of the victim.

2. Any person who violates the Electronic Financial Transactions Act of Defendant AV shall receive or promise to receive any consideration.