The Defendant 2016 Gohap 7 is indicated as “I” in the facts charged of the 3 foot H in the G in the Young-si Area G through the victim E, a corporation that the victim E operates (hereinafter “F”), but is indicated as “H” as stated in the certified copy of the real estate registry.

Around May 2012, knowing that the building (hereinafter referred to as “H building”) is owned by the victim, the victim stated that “I will sell the house to the company because there is a team selling the house to the company,” and that “I would make it difficult to sell the house to the injured party for the purpose of getting taxes.” However, I would like to sell the above victim at a low price.

The term “the victim” refers to “the victim’s building to proceed with his business.”

On August 22, 2012, the Defendant, at the office of K Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “K”), operated by the injured party in the J on March 2, 2012 (hereinafter referred to as “K”), would dispose of the H building at the site of “K,” and then dispose of the H building at the site of H until December 31, 2012, KRW 3,101,939,295 (K: 65,350,000, M: 153,311,470, E: 2,293,27,277,828, and KRW 385,000,000,000,000,000 from the K Corporation’s outstanding loan to the K, 1,057,000,000.

However, if H building is registered as F, it is easy to dispose of H building to be taken over by F, and F will purchase the shares of F in total at KRW 10 million.

“A false representation was made.”

However, in fact, even if the Defendant received H building from the injured party, he/she thought that he/she would use the building as a collateral. While the amount of taxes in arrears is equivalent to KRW 41,700,000,000, the facts charged are as follows: “The amount of taxes in arrears is equivalent to KRW 100,000,000,000,000,000.”

3,486,939,295 won, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "victim, such as an objection, etc.") shall be paid by the victim.