beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고단1072

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2] The Defendant, along with his/her name and incompetence (title D), conspired to acquire profits by forging a new contract for mobile phone service, etc. using another person's personal information while operating an office, which is a mobile phone consignment store, and then openly using another person's personal information, and then, his/her name and incompetences acquired another person's personal information in order to forge a new contract for mobile phone service with the above personal information while managing the above place of business, and the Defendant forged a new contract for mobile phone service using the above personal information and sent it to the telecommunications agency and opened it. On November 8, 2013, the Defendant concluded a "sale agency contract" with F and E to act as an agent for the affairs, such as sales of the mobile phone period, subscription, etc. supplied by the F of the credit rating company.

1. From November 13, 2013 to November 22, 2013, the Defendant forged a new mobile phone service contract in the Jung-gu Daejeon Special Metropolitan City and 102 “E” stating the name, resident registration number, address, etc. of H in each subscriber column using a pentle in the form of a mobile phone service contract and a contract for the installment of a terminal, and forged a new mobile phone service contract in the name of each of the relevant holders, which is a private document in relation to H’s rights, duties, and a contract for the construction of a mobile phone service contract in the form of a device, for the purpose of exercising the right of H’s rights and duties, and forged one copy of each contract for the construction of a mobile phone service contract in the form of a private document in the name of each of the relevant holders, and forged a sales contract in the form of a device, respectively.

2. On November 13, 2013, the Defendant at the foregoing place, sent the forged mobile phone new service contract and the mobile phone sales contract, which is the other party to the consignment contract, in turn, to an e-mail as if the document was duly formed, to the employee in charge of the F, who is the other party to the consignment contract, who knows the forgery at the above place.