If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Defendant and B are middle school-friendly districts, and C are women-friendly districts in B.

Defendant, B, and C conspired to acquire insurance money by deceiving an insurance company by pretending to a false traffic accident.

1. On June 29, 2012, around 13:30 on June 29, 2012, the Defendant, B, and C filed a false report with the Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., which caused a traffic accident involving the collision with the Otoba, which the Defendant was driving in the front of the Ga-Sa Sports Park in the following cities:

The Samsung Fire Insurance Co., Ltd, which believed this as true, paid the Defendant the sum of KRW 1,126,120,120 under the name of hospital treatment expenses, and KRW 1,126,120 under the name of hospital treatment expenses, 70,000 under the name of agreement, and acquired it by fraud.

2. On July 31, 2012, around 21:45, the Defendant, B, and C reported to the Hyundai Marine Insurance Company the occurrence of a collision between the Defendant and the Defendant’s vehicle driving E news service in the C’s hub park in the south-dong area of the Yan-dong, Chungcheongnam-si. Around July 31, 2012.

The modern marine insurance company believed this to be true shall pay B a sum of KRW 1,175,730 under the pretext of agreement, 950,000, and hospital treatment expenses. C shall be paid KRW 900,000 under the pretext of agreement, KRW 241,780 under the pretext of hospital treatment expenses, KRW 1,291,780 under the pretext of hospital treatment expenses, and KRW 1,291,780 under the pretext of bicycle repair expenses.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police suspect against the accused, B, or C;

1. Statement of each police statement related to F and G;

1. The receipt of the report on accidents involving modern maritime affairs and fire insurance;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the receipt of a report on Samsung Fire Insurance Accidents;

1. Relevant Articles 347 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and the choice of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;