구상금
1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the basic facts are as stated in Paragraph 1 of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act. Thus, this part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is cited as it is by the main text of
2. The plaintiff's assertion
A. Defendant A was negligent in driving Oral Ba in violation of the signal of this case. ② Defendant A operated Oral Ba at the time of the instant accident, even if Defendant A could not recognize the violation of the signal of Defendant A, Defendant A had been negligent in driving the Oral Ba while driving the Oral Ba with no license for four months prior to the instant accident. Also, Defendant A was sentenced to suspension of indictment for driving the Oral Ba in the form of crime. The Oral Ba driving by Defendant A at the time of the instant accident not only driven the Oral Ba, which was owned by Defendant A without a license, without a license, but also driven the Oral Ba which was driven by Defendant A without a license, but also deemed to have caused the instant accident, and thus, Defendant A's failure to grasp the structure, performance, and characteristics of the Oral Ba as well as the psychological burden of the theftal Ba. ③ In light of Article 50 (3) of the Road Traffic Act, Defendant A's driver should wear life safety equipment as prescribed by Ordinance of the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, and Home Affairs.
B. Meanwhile, although Defendant B and C had a duty to protect and supervise Defendant A as a parent of Defendant A, Defendant A was negligent in neglecting this duty and caused the instant accident.
C. Therefore, the defendants are jointly and severally liable to compensate for the losses of I caused by the above accident. The plaintiff is 149,766.