If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

1. On November 2012, 2012, at a place where it is impossible to identify a place below Daejeon Warman, the Defendant embezzled his name-free passenger’s juncing that he would acquire 94,000 won of the market value of S3 mobile phone 1 mobile phone and return it to the victim, without taking necessary procedures.

2. On November 2012, at a place where it is difficult to know the place of Daejeon or lower in Daejeon, the Defendant embezzled the unknown passenger’s name in mind to dispose of without taking necessary procedures, such as acquiring an amount equivalent to KRW 847,00 in the market value of the gallon 1 mobile phone (S2 mobile phone) and returning it to the victim.

3. On November 2012, at a place where it is difficult to know the place of Daejeon or lower in Daejeon, the Defendant embezzled the unknown passenger’s name in mind that he/she would be disposed of without taking necessary procedures, such as acquiring an amount equivalent to KRW 99,90,00 of the market value of one gallon mobile phone set up in the Defendant’s driver C cab, and returning it to the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness D;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 360 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.