However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a three-dimensional car.

On June 29, 2012, the Defendant driven the above car at around 22:55, and driven the road of three lanes in front of the community credit cooperatives in the Southern-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, Incheon, in accordance with three-lanes from the boundary of the water distribution station to the distance of 50km in speed.

At the time, there was a large number of rains at night, and there was an intersection in which signals, etc. are installed, so it was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service is a person to reduce speed and to see well the right and the right of the road, and to drive safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, by neglecting this, the Defendant neglected and proceeded with the fact that the vehicle driving signal is changed to the stop signal, the Defendant did not discover the victim D(57 years old), E(n, 20 years old), which was standing on the right side in accordance with the pedestrian signal, and did not see the victim D(57 years old), E(n, 20 years old).

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim D, such as a 12-day therapy, which requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment of the victim D due to such occupational negligence, and each victim E suffered injury, such as a multi-faceted streke-up which requires approximately 12 weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement made to F and D;

1. A report on the initial action against the traffic accident scene, a report on the actual condition survey report, and on-site photographs;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (report on telephone communications of a victim);

1. Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (2) 1 and 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents concerning Facts constituting an offense, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. The fact that the vehicles under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are covered by the comprehensive automobile insurance, and the defendant is insured on December 10, 2012.