For the reasons indicated in its reasoning, the lower court upheld the first instance judgment that acquitted the Defendant on the ground that there was no proof of crime on the charge of accepting bribe from the end of July 2007 to the beginning of August 2007, and the charge of accepting bribe from October 2007.

Examining the record, the above determination by the court below is justifiable.

There is no error of exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, or of misapprehending relevant legal principles.

On the other hand, the prosecutor appealed the entire judgment of the court below, but the remaining not guilty portion is not indicated in the petition of appeal or the reasoning of appeal.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.