A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,000,000 won.

However, as to Defendant A, this shall not apply.

1. Defendant A

A. A. Violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Arrangement, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (i.e., brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts) is a person who operated a commercial sex trafficking establishment on the sixth floor of Daejeon P building from the end of August 2017 to September 26, 2017, with the trade name of “E”.

The defendant employed 1 to 2 women at the above business establishment, and received 140,000 won from 10,000 to 140,000 won from the franking customers, and let the above women do the similarity act using hand upon termination of marina price against customers in the room prepared within the business establishment, and some of them (40,000 won in the case of 10,000 won and 60,000 won in the case of 140,00 won in the case of 10,000 won) out of the price of sexual traffic received from customers.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

B. On September 2017, the Defendant, even an offender, was aware of his knowledge at the mutual infinite coffee shop located in the Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, and thereafter, he controlled the business from the police.

Because there has already been ever been controlled, NA has operated a business instead of NA

A request was made to the effect that a fine would be imposed at the time of first crackdown, and that a fine would be paid in full upon the request, and upon that request, B made a false statement to the effect that the person who operates a commercial sex business establishment was B, upon investigation by the Daejeon Taeduk Police Station and investigation by the economic 2 team office on October 19, 2017.

As a result, the defendant instigated B to escape a person who commits a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment.

2. Defendant B, as described in the above 1-B B, was investigated at the investigation of the Daejeon Police Station and the economic 2 Team office on October 19, 2017 by his teacher, and the Defendant falsely stated to the effect that he was operating the said sexual traffic establishment.

As a result, the defendant, who committed a crime corresponding to a fine or heavier punishment, had the above A escape.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Defendant B.