However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is (State) a person who is engaged in the driving of the Citland Co., Ltd. owned by the Defendant.

On September 27, 2015, the Defendant driven the above vans around 11:55, and led to the national highways of 17 lanes of the end of 892 two-lanes of aggregate letter 892 to the front section from the bridges.

At this point, there was a center line of yellow domin lines, so there was a duty of care to safely proceed to the right side of the center line by accurately manipulating the front and rear left and right of the Defendant, who is engaged in driving of the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got the front part of the driving vehicle of the victim D(42) E, which normally proceeds from the opposite part due to the negligence that led to the center line, received the front part of the Defendant’s driving vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from the above occupational negligence to the victim D such injury as a stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke stoke s to the right side of the victim D, to the victim F (the 78 years old) who is the passenger of the victimized vehicle, about 18 weeks of treatment, and to the victim G (the 73 years old) who is the passenger of the Defendant driving vehicle for about 8 weeks of treatment, respectively. The Defendant sustained from the victim H (the 64 years old), the victim stoke stoke stoke s to the right side stoke stoke stoke s to the right side stoke stoke s to be treated for about 9 weeks of treatment, and the victim stoke stoke s to the victim J (the 53 years old stoke stoke stoke s to the victim J (the 63 years old s to the victim).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each statement of I, J, H, G, K, L and D;

1. A traffic accident report (1) (2) (2)

1. A report on investigation (related to calculation of injury to victims);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3(1) and (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents under the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts.