업무상횡령
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant: (a) from around November 2012, 201, purchased admission tickets from tourists entering the C military service tourism leisure team of the C military service and the D sales ticket office affiliated with the D sales ticket office with the C military service; and (b) collected admission tickets from visitors entering the inspection ticket office through the inspection ticket office; and (c) has been engaged in the business of depositing them into the inspection ticket office on or around December 30, 2012; (d) has received 40,000 won from the above E, excluding KRW 2,000,000, out of which the Defendant used the remaining 38,000 won, except for the remaining KRW 2,000, while keeping them in business for the C military service of the victim; and (e) has embezzled it by arbitrarily consuming 23 times in total as indicated in the attached list of crimes.
2. The evidence as shown in the facts charged in the instant case includes the statement in each court and investigation agency of F, G, E, H, I, and J as well as the investigation report (attached to the statement of deposits of the suspect A's admission fees). We examine whether each of the above evidence can be admitted as the facts charged.
먼저 F, G, E의 법정 및 수사기관에서의 진술은, 이들이 매표원으로 일하면서 피고인에게 별지 범죄일람표 매표일시 란 기재 날짜에 해당 입장료 란 기재 금액을 건넸다는 것을 주요한 내용으로 하고 있는데, 위 각 진술은 일관성이 없을 뿐만 아니라, 이들이 건넸다는 금액이 얼마인지에 관하여 진술하게 된 시점은 해당 매표일시 란 기재 날짜로부터 최소 3개월의 시간이 흐른 뒤인데, 그 금액을 기억하고 있는 경위에 관한 진술도 메모 등에 의한 것이 아니라 단순히 기억력에 의지하였다는 내용으로서 경험칙상 수긍하기 어려워 F, G, E의 법정 및 수사기관에서의 진술은 믿기 어렵다.
Next, the statements of the I in its investigative agency and court are F, G, and E, the major contents of which are the facts acquired by the I through coverage of F, G, and E.