채무부존재확인
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons for the court's explanation of this case are as follows: (a) the "No.D." of the first instance judgment No. 4, No. 11 is changed into "No. 12"; and (b) the "No. 12" is changed into "No. 5; and (c) the end of No. 11 is the end of No. 5. 11, "No. 1 is presumed to have been given specific and detailed explanation as to the content of the terms of the exemption in this case even if the defendant provided a general explanation from the plaintiff's side on the Special Agreement on the Injury by UnInsurance," and the judgment on the additional proposal made by the plaintiff at the trial is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment except for the addition under Paragraph (2) below.
2. The plaintiff asserts that the exemption clause of this case only has an obligation to explain when he/she subscribed to a special agreement on injury by an uninsurance motor vehicle, but the defendant does not have an obligation to explain since he/she did not subscribe to the above special agreement.
In full view of the purport of the entire arguments in the evidence Nos. 1 and 2 (including each number), the defendant can recognize the fact that the defendant subscribed to a special agreement on injury by an Uninsured Motor Vehicle (the plaintiff also joined the said special agreement in his/her preparatory document dated January 14, 2014). Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion on a different premise is without merit without further review.
3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.