However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On January 18, 2019, at around 18:18:18, the Defendant: (a) stolen the Defendant’s “C,” which is a store selling household goods in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju-gu, by using a gap in the market price of KRW 43,00,000, which was placed by the victim D to sell.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (fields, site rents, etc.), investigation reports (Attachment of photographs of damaged articles);

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the same Act concerning the crime, selection of fines;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the amount of damage is relatively small, and considering the fact that the defendant would pay the price of goods to the victim after returning the damaged goods and would normally purchase the goods normally after returning the damaged goods, the fact that there was no previous conviction in the last thirty years, economic situation,

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for confinement in a workhouse (in cases where a sentence of suspended execution of punishment is invalidated or revoked and the defendant fails to pay a fine);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;