2. The judgment of the court below is in favor of the defendant, and there are favorable circumstances such as the defendant's acknowledgement of the crime of this case and the fact that there is no criminal record other than the amount of fine once. However, considering these circumstances, the court below seems to have determined the defendant's punishment by reducing the amount of punishment by considering the above circumstances. The act of transferring the means of access, such as passbook, etc. like the crime of this case not only damages the security and reliability of electronic financial transactions, but also harms society by using the so-called Bosping, etc. in the crime and massing many other victims, etc., and the head of passbook who actually transferred the defendant caused damage by using it in such crime, and all other circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, living environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.