If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

[criminal record] On August 13, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and six months of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment was finalized on the 21st of the same month. On December 9, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment at the Daegu District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive on the 10th of the same month.

[2] Criminal facts, Defendant B, C, D, E, and F are the employees of the Young-gu University neighboring the Young-gu University in Gyeonggi-do, and the employees of the Young-gu, who are the violent organizations engaged in the activities in the Han-gu, Gyeong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, Dong-dong, and Devise-do, which are the area over which the Corporation is located, or their memorial forces.

On July 24, 201, the Defendant, B, C, and D were divided into the E, F (an indictment of non-detention on the same day), and the G Studio parking lot in the Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, Gyeong-si, B, and the Defendant committed an intentional act on the part of the Defendant while driving the Cub car (H).

The traffic accident occurred at the time is an accident intentionally caused by the Defendant, B, C, and D, and even though there was no particular injury due to the accident, the Defendant conspireds with the Defendants B, C, D, E, and F to receive insurance proceeds from the Defendant’s Hyundai Sea Commercial Reinsurance Co., Ltd. in collusion with the Defendant, C, D, E, and F to receive the insurance proceeds, etc. as if the accident actually occurred, and as if the accident occurred, it was caused by the accident.

Accordingly, C, E, and F are hospitalized in the "K Assembly member" in the same cityJ, and Defendant B, C, C, and D have claimed false insurance money from an employee in charge of the victimized person as if the actual accident occurred, and around that time, C received 250,000 won under the pretext of agreement, etc., D, 279,200 won under the same name, D, B, 2,429,830 won under the pretext of vehicle repair cost and agreement deposit, and E received 1,023,750 won under the pretext of agreement, etc., and F received 4,91,050 won under the same name, including the sum of 928,270 won.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Second prosecutor examination protocol against E: